Boris Johnson news latest: PM seeks political revival with policy blitz & More Trending News

A cross-party alliance of MPs and lords have arrange a parliamentary group to foyer for a ban on lead shot used to kill wildlife for consumption, which they are saying additionally causes the loss of life of 100,000 different birds every year.

The Lead Ammunition All Party Parliamentary Group is becoming a member of forces with the largest wildlife organisations within the UK to oppose the poisonous ammunition, which is usually used to kill animals reminiscent of pheasants, partridges, rabbits, grouse, hares and even woodpigeons.

Its members argue folks additionally endure the consequences of lead air pollution from consuming recreation meat in addition to from coming into contact with wildlife, vegetation, soil and pets which were contaminated.

Read the main points on this unique by Jane Dalton:

Boris Johnson will reportedly enable folks to make use of their housing advantages to purchase properties, as a part of a set of policy bulletins geared toward easing the housing disaster and guaranteeing his personal habitation of Downing Street continues.

Seeking to regain the initiative after 41 per cent of Tory MPs voted to oust him, the prime minister is anticipated to make use of a speech in Lancashire on Thursday to announce plans to tear up guidelines stopping folks from declaring the profit as a part of their revenue when making use of for a mortgage and utilizing it to make month-to-month funds.

With the price of housing advantages having been anticipated to rise to £30bn final 12 months, Mr Johnson will reportedly argue that this cash can be higher spent serving to folks onto the property ladder than on paying their hire – in a policy dubbed “benefits to bricks” by one minister, in keeping with The Times.

My colleague Andy Gregory stories:

Shadow minister Jess Phillips is amongst these questioning how Boris Johnson’s reported policy to permit folks to make use of housing advantages to pay their mortgates will work in actuality, provided that people with greater than £16,000 in financial savings and investments don’t qualify for the profit.

“It’s almost as if Boris Johnson doesn’t do much benefits casework,” the Labour MP quipped.

And Resolution Foundation chief government Torsten Bell tweeted:

MPs have expressed fury amid new fears the federal government plans to breach worldwide legislation with plans to tear up the Northern Ireland protocol, Kate Devlin and Andrew Woodcock report.

Leaked correspondence as we speak confirmed a senior authorized adviser warned it couldn’t be argued “credibly” that there was no different to unilaterally overriding Mr Johnson’s Brexit settlement.

Reports additionally emerged that Sir James Eadie, the federal government’s impartial barrister on nationwide authorized points, had not been consulted on whether or not the deliberate invoice will break worldwide legislation.

A former cupboard minister advised The Independent that not asking Sir James’s opinion on such an essential matter was “unprecedented”.

With rumours of a post-confidence vote reshuffle rife in Westminster, allies of Boris Johnson have warned him to not reward rebels who sought to finish his premiership on Monday evening.

One ministerial ally mentioned: “Reach out to them? F**k off. What kind of message would that send?”

“There are only so many jobs in government. You cannot afford to reward disloyalty. For a start, it does not work. You don’t pull people over to your point of view that way. People don’t become more loyal when they join the government, but they can become less loyal when they leave it.

“And the message it sends would be terrible. That you reward those who are disloyal, who vote against you remaining prime minister? He should be rewarding loyalty instead, and there are a few people who do not appear to have been particularly loyal so far, which could create space.”

Another instructed there was no must widen the cupboard as a result of there was no different candidate to Mr Johnson, who may enchantment to all sides of the get together.

“Who is there who can appeal to hardline Brexiteers and those who backed remain better than Boris? I don’t see anyone stepping forward.”

Our Whitehall editor Kate Devlin and political editor Andrew Woodcock have the complete story right here:

Boris Johnson will reportedly search to permit folks to make use of their housing advantages to purchase properties, as a part of a set of policy bulletins tomorrow geared toward easing the housing disaster.

The prime minister is anticipated to make use of a speech in Lancashire to announce plans to tear up guidelines stopping folks from declaring the profit as a part of their revenue when making use of for a mortgage and utilizing it to make month-to-month funds.

One minister dubbed the policy “benefits to bricks” and claimed it will allow younger folks to move mortgage lenders’ affordability checks, in keeping with The Times.

Shelter’s chief government Dame Polly Neate has beforehand mentioned Boris Johnson’s “hare-brained idea” to increase the precise to purchase to housing affiliation tenants is “the opposite of what the country needs”, warning: “There could not be a worse time to sell off what remains of our last truly affordable social homes.”

Speaking to ITV News on Wednesday night, housing minister Michael Gove appeared to counsel that Mr Johnson was dedicated to making sure that new properties are constructed to replenish the inventory of properties offered underneath the scheme.

“We both need to build more social housing and help people into ownership,” Mr Gove mentioned. “When Conservative governments in the past were successful in extending home ownership, they were also building council and social homes as well – that’s what Winston Churchill did, that’s what Harold Macmillan did.

“We’ve got to get back to that and the prime minister is determined that we have a Churchill/Macmillan-style approach.”

The Times stories that Mr Gove is alleged to have secured an settlement that every residence offered might be changed by a brand new one.

Boris Johnson is ready to verify plans to increase the precise to purchase to housing affiliation tenants as he seeks to restore his fortunes after a Tory revolt towards his management.

The prime minister will use a significant speech in Lancashire tomorrow to announce new measures to doubtlessly assist thousands and thousands onto the property ladder.

He may even decide to element “reforms to help people cut costs in every area of household expenditure” over the approaching weeks as he seeks to ease the affect of hovering costs.

According to the Spectator’s deputy political editor Katy Balls, Rishi Sunak has spoken to Tory MPs this night at a 1922 Committee assembly, which noticed the chancellor obtain “a decent reception” with “supportive questions”.

Mr Sunak is reported to have echoed Boris Johnson’s insistence earlier as we speak that he needed to chop tax, however solely as soon as he believes it a “responsible” time to take action, with the chancellor quoted as saying he would “never, on an act of blind faith, do them at the expense of the fundamental soundness of our economy or public finances”, including that “tax cuts are the reward for a government that is prepared to make difficult choices elsewhere … I promise you we are”.

Giving their tackle the assembly, one MP current advised the journal that the majority of the get together accepts the times of the magic cash tree are over, with spending self-discipline and decrease taxes described as very important going ahead.

In her newest Independent Voices piece, our columnist Salma Shah means that Boris Johnson ought to “try going down in a blaze of glory and do the unthinkable”. She writes:

“Please don’t come at me with your tedious takes about how he’ll never do the honourable thing and leave his post. This is not a suggestion to lobotomise him in the hopes of changing the habits of a lifetime. Resigning would simply upend everyone’s assumptions and create enormous chaos, something he seems rather good at.

“The lack of an alternative leader has been a strong and plausible line of defence thus far. Why not put it to the test and see whether it stacks up? Could he reinvigorate his position by wrongfooting disgruntled backbenchers and take the fight to the wannabes? Would he risk it all to gain it back again? He’s got little to lose.”

You can learn her pondering in full right here: